Cases Using CodeSuite

CodeSuite has become a de facto standard for litigation involving software IP theft and infringement. Here are just a few cases where CodeSuite has been used.

Brocade v. A10 Networks

Case: C 10-03428 LHK (PSG)
Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District Of California, San Jose Division

• Alleged copying of software for network controllers.
• Compared software source code using CodeCross, CodeDiff, and CodeMatch.
• Measured software development using CodeCLOC.
• Evidence presented in an expert report and at trial.

SplitFish v. Bannco

Case: l:10cv297
Court: U.S. District Court, Northern Easter District of Virginia, Alexandria Division

• Preliminary injunction against defendant granted.
• Alleged copying of firmware for video game controllers.
• Compared source code using BitMatch.
• Evidence presented in a declaration.
  

Robin Antonick v. Electronic Arts

Case: 3:11-cv-01543-CRB (EDL)
Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District of California

• Contract dispute.
• Examined source code and binary code.
• Compared software binary code and source code using BitMatch and CodeMatch.
• Evidence presented in an expert report and at trial.

Symantec v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case number: 12075-06
Court: US Tax Court of California

• Software tax dispute
• Software comparison using CodeDiff.
• Evidence presented in an expert report and at trial.

Rasterex Holdings v. Research in Motion

Case number: 2003-cv-76785
Court: Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia

• Copyright infringement case involving mobile document translation and storage software.
• Software comparison using CodeMatch.
• Evidence presented in an expert report and at deposition.

ConnectU v. Facebook

Case: 1:04-cv-11923
Court: U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts

• Case was settled.
• Alleged copyright infringement case involving social network software.
• Compared software source code using CodeMatch.